How the cookie (doesn’t) crumble… an update
Author
Tim Axon
Published
So, the dust has now settled on Google’s unexpected third-party cookie U-Turn – so what does it mean?
Instead of completely removing TPCs, Google now plans to introduce a new user experience in Chrome, allowing individuals to make informed choices about cookie usage across their browsing. This decision came after extensive discussions with various stakeholders, including regulators, publishers, web developers, and advertisers. While the Privacy Sandbox initiative will continue, aiming to provide privacy-preserving ad solutions, Google’s U-turn highlights the complexity and controversy surrounding the shift away from TPCs.
Despite Google’s delay, there are underlying issues which have been highlighted by recent studies carried out by WARC and one of our partners, Optimizely.
The key findings include:
- A staggering 97% of executives felt unprepared for the shift away from third-party cookies.
- Over 75% of consumers prefer personalised experiences.
- 86% of executives admit their personalisation capabilities are inadequate.
- A mere 2% of brands effectively leverage a mix of experimentation, marketing mix modeling (MMM), and attribution for measurement.
Whilst these studies were released prior to the Google announcement (in the case of the Optimizely report- just a week before), they remain critically important. Here’s why:
1. Inevitability of Change: Google’s decision to delay the phaseout of TPCs is not a permanent solution. The shift towards privacy-preserving technologies is inevitable, driven by regulatory pressures and consumer demands for greater privacy. Brands must use this time to prepare for the eventual elimination of TPCs.
2. Preparation is Lagging: Optimizely’s study reveals that 97% of executives felt unprepared for the shift away from third-party cookies. This lack of preparedness is concerning, given that 75% of consumers prefer personalised experiences, and 86% of executives admit their personalisation capabilities are inadequate.
3. Experimentation and First-Party Data: With the decline of TPCs, brands must focus on first-party data and experimentation. Controlled website experiments are crucial for gaining direct insights into customer behaviour and preferences, which can inform more effective marketing strategies. Have a look at our case study section, if you don’t believe us!!
4. Adapting to New Technologies: The ongoing development of the Privacy Sandbox and other first-party data strategies necessitates a culture of continuous experimentation. Testing new methodologies in a controlled environment allows brands to refine their approaches before broader implementation, ensuring they remain competitive in a privacy-centric digital landscape.
The Path Forward
To thrive in a future without third-party cookies, brands must embrace a proactive approach to personalisation, website optimisation, and continuous experimentation. This involves:
- not only collecting first-party data but also leveraging it effectively to tailor customer interactions.
- testing different user experiences to identify what works best for audiences, driving engagement and conversions.
- taking a data-driven approach that ensures that marketing strategies are effective and aligned with consumer preferences.
The delay in phasing out third-party cookies offers a temporary respite, but the fundamental shift towards privacy-centric digital marketing is inevitable. As Google continues to develop the Privacy Sandbox and other privacy-preserving technologies, brands must stay informed and adapt their strategies accordingly.
For further information about the statistics outlined in this article visit:
https://www.optimizely.com/how-digital-leaders-are-thinking-about-personalization/